Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Why do Wormholers pick on the little guy? - in Wormholes [original thread]
Garr Khan did nothing wrong. Except this awful thread.
- by Kyle Myr - at 2015.04.10 00:15:14
|
2. Tranquility: Incompatible Build - in Macintosh [original thread]
Arthur Aihaken wrote: So this morning there's a Mac patch (no details whatsoever), and after initially working I can no longer login to Tranqulity. I logged in later with a different account on the same machine, it re-ran the patch for that cha...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2013.10.30 16:43:00
|
3. Retaining new players, the non-new player pov. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yeah, sorry, I thought your fit was an awful PvP fit, not an awful PvE fit. It can be hard to tell. I'm sorry you wanted to help newbies and then quit. Take solace in the fact that you were probably just giving bad advice.
- by Kyle Myr - at 2013.04.09 23:06:00
|
4. Retaining new players, the non-new player pov. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
NARDAC wrote: http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14915039 Why do you have a large remote armor rep on a shield tanked Machariel? I'm not the best source of advice for new players out there, but 'don't fly what you can...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2013.04.09 21:54:00
|
5. Expedition Bookmarks/Sharing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I earned my first couple billion as the middleman in this process. Flying around bookmarking stages of escalations was honestly as much or more work than running the sites themselves (and the less fun part of the process, though I enjoyed navigati...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2013.03.30 19:14:00
|
6. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
EvilweaselSA wrote: Kyle Myr wrote: Soldarius wrote: I was all like :sadpanda: when we were told to move to Period Basis. Then I looked at dotlan. Known Period Basis Moons . Sov Holders vOv Don't trust Dotlan's moon scan data....
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.31 02:35:00
|
7. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Soldarius wrote: I was all like :sadpanda: when we were told to move to Period Basis. Then I looked at dotlan. Known Period Basis Moons . Sov Holders vOv Don't trust Dotlan's moon scan data. At best, it's incomplete. At worst, it's ...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.31 00:42:00
|
8. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sigras wrote: im not having trouble with that, my rebuttal was to the people who said that alchemy would be done with 0 profit. Im saying that nobody would do the alchemy on a tower for 0 profit, especially since that now means the tower cant b...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.29 01:57:00
|
9. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sigras wrote: TL;DR I understand that alchemy could push the Tech price to essentially cost, but that would require a lot of people doing a lot of work for almost no return, just like mining could push the mineral price to zero, but who wo...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.28 05:55:00
|
10. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Lord Zim wrote: I've already said I was wrong, I'd forgotten about a few suggestions which were hidden amongst posts of people (like jade) taking the express train to mount tinfoil and then actually start making su...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.13 16:09:00
|
11. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Given that 1.1 introduced the mandatory interruption in defensive ally participation I certainly can. 1.1 is a rushed mess of a patch that does nothing except protect large alliances from the consequences of their warde...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.13 00:30:00
|
12. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade, the reason he's calling you out for lying about moon money income is because you either are horribly misinformed, or deliberately copying misinformation. Goonfleet's finances are a fairly open book, and we've actually been chronically broke...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.08 01:21:00
|
13. Goons/Test fc needed training wheels. - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
I came here to post that the FC that flew against you today is probably the dumbest ****** I've ever heard in EVE. Week old newbies would be more reliable, competent, and tolerable. No scout, a curious inability to not get traffic controlled on ga...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.07 11:06:00
|
14. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
When you're in a coalition of thousands, you have the benefit of a large talent pool. We actually do have a few members who are comparatively good at fighting in empire, and a few fleet commanders who are skilled enough at running fleets that are ...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.07 00:12:00
|
15. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Kyle Myr wrote: and accept that you don't mean any of this as a personal attack because you're incapable of seeing people with GSF tickers as individuals. Does that actual upset you or are you just being sarcastic...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.06 02:59:00
|
16. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Your explanation has nothing really to do with the point I made. No real surprise though since the whole purpose of your post was to make a subtle troll / personal attack (bravo btw, you are getting better at slipping t...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.06 02:05:00
|
17. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Powers Sa wrote: Kyle Myr wrote: Jade Constantine wrote: Lord Zim wrote: This is a baldfaced lie. 1.0 was a wardec patch which was supposed to be with mercs in mind, it just failed miserably because of the allies mechanic loophole w...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.06 01:14:00
|
18. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Kyle Myr wrote: I dunno, we hired PL to kill Issler's towers fine. I'd say that meets the definition of both war dec work, mercenary, and results. One of the biggest problems in conducting a discussion with a 9000...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.06 01:02:00
|
19. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Lord Zim wrote: This is a baldfaced lie. 1.0 was a wardec patch which was supposed to be with mercs in mind, it just failed miserably because of the allies mechanic loophole which a lot of wardecced corps/alliances...
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.05 23:03:00
|
20. FYI: HOW TO FIX THE BLACK SCREEN-OF-EVE-DEATH - in Macintosh [original thread]
This worked great. If you are comfortable with the terminal environment, the only necessary step of that process is removing those 4 files.
- by Kyle Myr - at 2012.07.05 22:49:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |